Skip to main content

Book Review: Odyssey by Phil Vecchione

I have to admit up front that part of my problem with Odyssey by Phil Vecchione is that I read and loved his book, Never Unprepared.  Never Unprepared dealt with session preparation for the GM and was a tight, informative, ridiculously helpful book.  I went into Odyssey, a book on campaign management, with similar hopes, but ended up disappointed.  This isn’t to say that Odyssey is a bad book, it just came under the bar of his former work.


First, the good parts.  The book tackles an ambitious topic, not the running of a game session, but actually managing a full blown campaign.  The book tackles this several sections, including how to create a campaign, how to manage the campaign as it goes, and how to end it.  I find the section on ending particularly apt, given how I just ended mine.  Each area has this fictional gaming group of three players and a GM introduce and close each section, first with the GM doing it wrong and then with her doing it right (kudos to the authors for making the GM a black female in a wheelchair, by the way).  The examples are hyperbolic or ridiculous, but are believable as examples.

My problem, quite simply, is one I think that could not really be avoided.  Namely given the vast multitude of personalities that GM's possess, and the many different games--both in genres and rules--that you have in the roleplaying game universe, trying to move past generalities quickly excludes people.  No where was this more evident that in the playing styles of the two authors: Vecchione who describes himself as a "story" GM (implying his games focus on character interaction and development) and Walt Ciechanowski who describes himself as a pretty "free form" GM who does little prep work beyond creating a bunch of "ingredients" and throwing them all together as the game goes along.  So by their own admission, their playing style differs from more tactical GM's or GM's that favor player agency over storylines, and also GM's that like to develop a lot more detail in advance.  As someone who, honestly, tends to be all three of those things, I kept looking for more solid advice about tools, e.g. how one keeps track of NPC's or platforms for campaign journals that allow multiple editors.  So the book has lots of helpful general, fairly abstract advice, but it doesn't have the hard-and-fast outlines that was seen in Never Unprepared.  Does this make the book bad?  No, it just tries really, really hard to be all things to all GM's, and in the process ends up a little soft in the process.

If Odyssey was a movie, I'd said "rent, but don't bother buying."  I enjoyed reading it, make no mistake, but I don't see myself going back to this book the way I do Never Unprepared. Since you can't do that, I'd say buy it if you can afford it easily or are really interested in the sort of foundational elements of gamemastering, pass on it if you are on the fence.

Comments

  1. Good review. I will second the recommendation for Never Unprepared.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who was disappointed. A book about GM'ing just needs to have a lot more concrete advice and tools than Odyssey is packing. The 1st edition DMG is the bar that everyone is supposed to be trying to match or beat.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A First Look at Prowlers and Paragons

For a long time I've been in the market for a new supers RPG.  Since running Marvel Heroic Roleplaying a few years ago, I've been looking at other games, including some that had been passed by the general public, e.g. DC Heroes Third Edition or Silver Age Sentinels.  This was based on the notion that supers RPG's are so niche and so under-performing as a general part of the RPG world that just because the game wasn't making a splash didn't mean it wasn't good.

Plus, I have my own tastes about what I like in a supers RPG, which I've touched on from time to time here, but to summarize I like a game that feels like a comic book, doesn't get bogged down in too much detail, but allows for PC growth and development in a tangible game-system way.  I also don't want to spend hours on character creation using a spreadsheet.  For that matter, it would be an added bonus if it could also accommodate a large number of players and didn't have glaring options…

Hexcrawling a City, an early look

One thing I've been slowly working on for the last year is another fantasy sandbox campaign.  My prior one was generally map-based, although a city featured prominently in it.  As time went by, it lost a lot of its "sandbox" quality and became more directed on my part.  In the process, I think it lost something.

So, after being away from fantasy for a solid year, it's time to get back to it.  I spent some of that last year thinking about cities.   Some fantasy RPG treat cities on a very detailed level, with maps of streets, etc.  But while that's fun "map porn" for GM's, how often would the players actually be seeing or using a map like that?  And how long would it take for them to just accrue that knowledge by exploring the city.  I've lived in my current city seven years, with a car, and I don't know how all the cities line up.  What I know are areas, neighborhoods, etc. some intimately, others not so much.  And if I was going to a new cit…

Large modular dungeon tiles

I made five 4" by 4" dungeon tiles, which is 80 square inches, almost twice my usual batch of tiles.  When added to what I've done already, this is how big a single room I can make:


14 by 14 squares, with four squares to spare.  That's a pretty big room (70 feet to a side).  If I wanted to mix it up, I could build something like this:


I'm probably going to take a little break from this project.  It has turned out well, but until I'm closer to doing a fantasy game I'm going to focus on the games I'm actually doing.
Speaking of which, it's game night tonight...