Skip to main content

Listen at the door, check for traps

As is often the case, my friend Adam mentions something on his own blog which then inspires a lengthy response from me.  In this case, it was this post, entitled "An Inconsistent Truth."  In it he complains about this issues of pacing, and the way that players can slow play to a grind by being overcautious.

Unfortunately, they don't know how to police themselves (or so it seems). Many of them forego what would be the most interesting, exciting, or cinematic option, instead looking to the most logical option; often making certain it is the surest, safest plan, devoid of conflict, drama, tension, and sadly, emotional impact, and resonance.
Right, because for some players, survival is the ultimate point of participating in roleplaying games.  Live to fight another day, get more stuff, etc.   Now that's not particularly heroic, it reflects a more picaresque style of play whose roots go back to the very beginning of RPG's.  Those were the days of Gygaxian lethal death traps, fragile PC's, and the notion that clever roleplaying meant doing your best to avoid an untimely end.

But heroes rush into danger, right?  They throw caution to the wind for the purposes of saving the innocent, defeating villains, etc.  Sure, they might play it a little smart and not be completely reckless, but taking a few lumps in the name of what's right is what heroism is all about.

Now Adam raised the question of whose responsibility it is to generate this tone.  That's a tough one, but I feel the majority of the opus is on the GM, mostly in terms of theme. If you at some point spring a death trap, say a poisoned lock, on the PC's, then they will be stopping to look for poisoned locks from them on out.  For me personally, when it comes to traps I don't like the "out of nowhere" option but instead will leave clues and let the players puzzle out what happened.  So rather than have the PC's constantly checking every dungeon wall for traps, I'll just have a headless body lying in the hallway and let the players ignore it at their peril.  Then the players are trained to not bog down gameplay but instead are trained to listen to descriptive language from me.

But sometimes it is just the players.  My gaming group that does the EOW weekend every year is notorious for this, because many of them are former military and/or law enforcement, and by God they are going to throw flash-bang grenades, "cut the pie," and a whole other host of sound tactics because they are projecting their own experiences onto the game (one where you don't get an extra life).

I don't know if the answer is to be as upfront as possible about what kinds of themes you want the campaign to have, or if the answer is to punish the players in subtle way when they start to bog things down (a sort of Pavlovian reflex).  "Oh, you spent three turns checking to see if the door was trapped, well now the guards inside have heard the scratching and are ready for you."

It's tough, and I'm not sure how to deprogram decades of gaming styles, but like Adam I keep trying.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A First Look at Prowlers and Paragons

For a long time I've been in the market for a new supers RPG.  Since running Marvel Heroic Roleplaying a few years ago, I've been looking at other games, including some that had been passed by the general public, e.g. DC Heroes Third Edition or Silver Age Sentinels.  This was based on the notion that supers RPG's are so niche and so under-performing as a general part of the RPG world that just because the game wasn't making a splash didn't mean it wasn't good.

Plus, I have my own tastes about what I like in a supers RPG, which I've touched on from time to time here, but to summarize I like a game that feels like a comic book, doesn't get bogged down in too much detail, but allows for PC growth and development in a tangible game-system way.  I also don't want to spend hours on character creation using a spreadsheet.  For that matter, it would be an added bonus if it could also accommodate a large number of players and didn't have glaring options…

Hexcrawling a City, an early look

One thing I've been slowly working on for the last year is another fantasy sandbox campaign.  My prior one was generally map-based, although a city featured prominently in it.  As time went by, it lost a lot of its "sandbox" quality and became more directed on my part.  In the process, I think it lost something.

So, after being away from fantasy for a solid year, it's time to get back to it.  I spent some of that last year thinking about cities.   Some fantasy RPG treat cities on a very detailed level, with maps of streets, etc.  But while that's fun "map porn" for GM's, how often would the players actually be seeing or using a map like that?  And how long would it take for them to just accrue that knowledge by exploring the city.  I've lived in my current city seven years, with a car, and I don't know how all the cities line up.  What I know are areas, neighborhoods, etc. some intimately, others not so much.  And if I was going to a new cit…

Large modular dungeon tiles

I made five 4" by 4" dungeon tiles, which is 80 square inches, almost twice my usual batch of tiles.  When added to what I've done already, this is how big a single room I can make:


14 by 14 squares, with four squares to spare.  That's a pretty big room (70 feet to a side).  If I wanted to mix it up, I could build something like this:


I'm probably going to take a little break from this project.  It has turned out well, but until I'm closer to doing a fantasy game I'm going to focus on the games I'm actually doing.
Speaking of which, it's game night tonight...